Search for: "Levin v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2006, 8:50 am
United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:19 am
Levine, 129 S. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 2:23 pm
Levine, 216 So. 3d 711 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:27 pm
See Adkins v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, David Levine and Thomas Kearns discuss the court’s decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
There has already been an outpouring of commentary on the leaked opinion in the Supreme Court’s pending Dobbs case, in which Samuel Alito (apparently joined by four of his colleagues) will not only decide that Mississippi’s 15-week cutoff for abortion access is constitutional but that Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:23 pm
The case, Rosenberg v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 9:02 pm
Beermann, Boston University School of Law In the wake of Lucia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
Yes, says New York’s Court of Appeals in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:06 am
Levine, 555 U .S. 555 (2007). [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
Levine [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:18 am
In Merck Sharpe & Dohme v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am
As stated in Becker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
“Across the board, we are slowly lifting the veil of impunity,” said Carissa Phelps, attorney at Levin Papantonio Rafferty, a national law firm that is representing survivors of Human Trafficking, including those who suffered injuries as a result of Pornhub’s distribution of child sex abuse material (CSAM). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 1:49 pm
In Printz v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
She argued U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:15 am
She argued U.S. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Virginia and Daubert v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
This is surprising, to say the least, since two years ago the same Court, in Wyeth v Levine, reached an opposite conclusion regarding the makers of brand-name drugs. [read post]
