Search for: "Leviness v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
Other coverage comes from Alexander Gray and Michael Levy for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
In the "Right to Be Forgotten" context, Google says that more than half of incoming requests fail to state valid legal claims. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:12 am
In Papish v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:11 am
As in Hylton v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:29 am
Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 11:39 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Roederer keeps its bottle while Cava loses its sparkleRoederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:54 pm
As the evidence has shown, the capabilities of districts to raise tax monies have been influenced by the size of the tax base available for the imposition of tax levies. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Nicola tells all.* Can the State automatically acquire ownership of your copyright? [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:36 am
” It’s not that they invariably charge inmates, although some states do, and levy a laundry list of fees for the fine services they deliver, but as in Barrett’s case, use it as a wedge to offset any claim of damages. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm
Yovich v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:41 am
Another recent example is BCCA Appeal Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:28 am
The facts in Shapiro v Ettenson, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 16, 2015], are fairly simple. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
