Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
 The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Carnwath, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, and Lord Hamblen. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Hamblen. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by Daniel Sokol
The judge was also unimpressed by the appellants’ evidence, stating that David Gale and Teresa had lied repeatedly to the court. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
Lord Thomas and Lord Kerr both agreed with Lord Briggs’ judgment, but Lord Kerr passed away a few days prior to the scheduled date for handing down the judgment. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by ASAD KHAN
Despite some evidence relating to some conventions, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a widespread and consistent state practice. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL [2007] 1 AC 359 at [147]. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 11 February Lord Justice Warby handed down judgment on the summary judgment application in the case of HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am by CMS
Lord Hodge who gave the only judgment (with which Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Leggatt, Lord Burrows and Lady Rose agreed) stated (at [33]): “.. the purpose of section 471(3) is to circumvent the difficult issues that can arise in the application of section 471(1). [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Carnwath, Lady Black, Lady Arden, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Sales. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Mance. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am by Jack Kennedy
On 16 December 2015, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Société Coopérative de Production SeaFrance SA v The Competition and Markets Authority. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am by Charlene Richer
On examining the authorities relied upon in the Court of Appeal (R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585 and R v O’Dowd [2009] EWCA Crim 905), the Court did not consider that there was any clear definitive statement on the issue now raised. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing)   Earlier this year, the Supreme Court  heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
 The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Kerr, delivering judgment, held that even if a presumption exists that Parliament intends Carltona to apply, it was displaced by a proper interpretation of articles 4(1) and 4 (2) of the 1972 Order read together. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]