Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
The appeal was heard on 16 June 2015 by Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge and judgment is currently awaited. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
It is unlikely that Lord Justice Leveson would be impressed. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
” The Judge also stated that “Here, as elsewhere, context is everything” and this focus on context and circumstances was approved by Lord Bingham in the House of Lords. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 1:50 am
Lord Wilson gave the leading judgment, with which Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson agreed. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
The minority (Lord Carnwath, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) would have held that section 32(1)(c) has no application to mistakes of law. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am
To put things in more simplistic terms, as described by Lord Justice Kitchin: "...it was [Rihanna's] case that the misrepresentation that she was associated with the t-shirt made it more attractive and so played a material part in the decision of the public to buy it".Lord Kitchin turned to the earlier decision in Edmund Irvine Tidswell Ltd v Talksport Ltd, where Justice Laddie formulated two criteria that needed to be established for a successful case… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
The Secretary of State decided that she was only entitled to a state pension from her 65th birthday. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
But if in fact the instructions issued in Georgia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Core Issues Trust, R (On the Application of) v Transport for London & Another [2014] EWCA Civ 34 is a fascinating ruling of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales (Lord Dyson MR, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Justice Christopher Clarke) since it isn't an intellectual property case at all, but has the potential to raise so many IP issues. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
” So claimed Lord Pearce in Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656. [read post]
