Search for: "MAJORS v. MAJORS" Results 1061 - 1080 of 62,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Major v. Western Home: California Court of Appeal Affirms $646,000 Punitive Damages Award
6 Jan 2009, 5:58 pm
The Court of Appeal relied heavily on the California Supreme Court's 1979 decision in Egan v. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
Biel v. St. James School (9th Cir. - June 25, 2019)
26 Jun 2019, 12:57 pm
  Not a majority, to be sure. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch (9th Cir. - March 24, 2016)
24 Mar 2016, 1:31 pm
The argument deemed persuasive in the majority opinion is an argument of the majority’s own creation. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
Corporate Governance and Campaign Finance: Citizens United v. FEC (The Politics of Judicial Activism, Part 2)
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
There is a second example of judicial activism in the majority opinion. [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/home/
New Judgment: Campbell v Gordon [2016] UKSC 3
6 Jul 2016, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Carwarth gave the majority judgment, with which Lord Mance and Lord Reed agreed. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
“Was Andy Warhol’s portrait of Prince copyright infringement? How this case could reshape IP law. Warhol v. Goldsmith is going to the Supreme Court for review. The case could have a major impact on copyright.”
14 Jun 2022, 6:14 am by Howard Bashman
Warhol v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
“The Supreme Court’s Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. Munoz; Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s majority opinion includes significant efforts, and violates some of her own precepts against excessive reliance on questionable history”
24 Jun 2024, 6:14 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Supreme Court’s Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
“Maine Supreme Court questions Melville Fuller statue outside Kennebec courthouse; The monument honors the Augusta-born former chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, who was part of the majority in the Plessy v. Ferguson decision that maintained racial segregation with the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine”
12 Aug 2020, 8:25 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court, who was part of the majority in the Plessy v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
“Bakke to the Future”: Supreme Court Reconsiders Affirmative Action with a Conservative Majority
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Last term, the new 6-3 conservative majority brought greater clarity to several areas with long-standing 5-4 divisions, including its decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
How Allen v. Cooper Breaks Important New (if Dubious) Ground on Stare Decisis
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Ninth Circuit Reverses Major Crimes Act Conviction on Indian Status Grounds
2 Aug 2016, 6:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
Materials in Federal DV Prosecution under Major Crimes Act (Colville)
25 Apr 2013, 6:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials so far in United States v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
:: Interview With Chief Justice Roberts On the MetLife v. Glenn Holding
23 Jun 2008, 6:23 pm
Nonetheless, his answers are taken from his concurring opinion in MetLife v. [read post]
Health Plan Law - http://www.healthplanlaw.com
APL v Alinta: Government will appeal Takeovers Panel jurisdiction decision
2 May 2007, 10:45 pm
The Treasuer and the Attorney-General have announced that the Government will apply to the High Court for special leave to appeal the decision of the Full Federal Court in APL v Alinta. [read post]
Australian Regulatory Compliance Review - http://www.djacobson.com/australian_regulatory_rev/
US v. Comstock: Will the U.S. Supreme Court Uphold the Federal Government's Power to Commit Sex Offenders, or Invoke Principles of Federalism?
8 Feb 2010, 10:28 am
2-8-2010 National:Currently pending before the Supreme Court is an important case, United States of America v. [read post]
Sex Offender Research by A Voice of Reason - http://sexoffenderresearch.blogspot.com/
Some choice quotes from the two opinions in Oregon v. Ice
14 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
For reasons I will explain in future posts, the Supreme Court's work today  in the Apprendi-Blakely Sixth Amendment case of Oregon v. [read post]
Sentencing Law and Policy - http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/
Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, en banc)
17 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, decided Sarei v. [read post]
International Law Reporter - http://ilreports.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Justice Thomas Had No Majority Opinion from October Sitting, But Still Wrote More Than Any Other Justice
9 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Another possibility is that he had the majority opinion in Allen v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Missouri’s liberal Supreme Court judges dissent in favor of free enterprise, while majority protects licensed real estate leasing agents
20 Jul 2011, 6:31 am by Harry Styron
Supreme Court decision, Sorrell v. [read post]
Ozarks Law & Economy - http://olp09.wordpress.com
Roberts’ Majority Opinion Preserving the Status Quo in Alabama Voting Rights Act Case Must Be Seen in Light of His Killing of Affirmative Action in Education in Today’s Students for Fair Admissions Case
29 Jun 2023, 7:28 am by Rick Hasen
A few weeks ago, after the Supreme Court preserved the (weak) status quo for Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in Allen v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/