Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2022, 7:54 am
1) If both remain loyal and don't speak, they will each get two years on a lesser charge; 2) If A speaks but B is loyal, A goes free, B gets eight years- and vice-a-versa. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:10 am
Accordingly, the appellant is treated as relying on its written case.Main Request - Claims 1 to 5Disclosure of the invention - Article 100(b) and Article 83 EPC2. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:11 am
Back in 2011, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that distribution of allegedly false statements by a broker-dealer was enough to create anti-fraud liability under Rule 10b-5(b) – explaining that because they didn’t have “ultimate responsibility” over the statement, they weren’t the “maker” described in the rule. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:47 am
A non-party to this matter (“AT & T”) filed an application with defendant Mobile City, Alabama Planning Commission (“Commission”) for a new wireless telecommunication facility to be built on a site leased by AT & T. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 6:26 am
” In addition,”[i]t does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 6:53 am
Lawrence B. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:57 am
"That there were tax deductions to the donors does not change matters. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:22 am
The EBA didn't feel it was necessary to answer such a question. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
The Panel in Tradewind Media, LLC d/b/a Intopic Media v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:58 pm
I have made the case for sanctioning Southern before (see here and here), so won’t bother repeating it here. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:53 pm
B's copy of James L. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:54 pm
This matters because practitioners and clients have to be aware that the most elegant and well-supported argumentation frequently doesn’t really matter if the judge thinks your client is in the wrong and has the broad degree of discretion accorded to courts in “soft” areas of IP law such as the Lanham Act. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 11:59 am
Don’t be surprised when they’re glad you called and ask you about a new legal matter or tell you about someone they know who might need your help. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
P. 60(b)(2) and (b)(3). [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 11:01 am
As a matter of fact, this wording does not exclude that there may be further components, such as builder substances that are not water-soluble.[2.5] Examples A to D of document D4, which were cited by the [opponent] define laundry detergent or cleaning compositions which are within the scope of claim 1 of the impugned patent and which further comprise the builder substance zeolite, which is not water-soluble. [2.6] Therefore, in view of the above considerations, the claimed… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am
But then we get to the 2901.05(B) Castle Doctrine. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
The court dismissed the claims, mainly because the advertisements were not misleading as a matter of law. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:23 am
If your back is hurting, and you don’t tell them, you haven’t told them everything! [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
European patent No. 1 773 302, filed on 16 February 2005 and claiming the priority date of 23 July 2004 from US application 10/898061 (D1), was opposed on the ground that its subject-matter lacked novelty and inventive step (Article 100(a) EPC) and was insufficiently disclosed (Article 100(b) EPC).The following documents were among those cited during the first-instance proceedings:D1: US2005/0152971 (application No. 10/898061), filed on 23 July 2004, priority application of the… [read post]
