Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
The case merits attention (a) because of the relative paucity of appellate decisions in this area, and (b) because it defines the inquiry in contract terms.The facts of the case are described in detail in the lower court's October 7, 2008, post-trial decision written by Justice Leonard B. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
" 35 USC § 100 (b) definiert "process" als "process, art, or method"; zudem "a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material". [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
k. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
., Appellants,v.FINANCIAL FREEDOM SENIOR FUNDING CORPORATION; FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACQUISITION, LLC; AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION A/K/A FANNIE MAE, Appellees. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:29 am
GWU lawprof John Banzhaf, in his occasional email commentary, raised this case, asserting: In this regard, Banzhaf notes that even the use of words which are clearly and obviously derogatory of those who practice the Jewish religion – e.g., “K*KE,” H**B or H*BE, H*MIE, J*WB*Y, etc. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As an auxiliary measure, it was requested that the following question be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA): a) If an authorisation is filed by facsimile, does the facsimile represent a copy in accordance with the Decision of the President [of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations (OJ Special Edition 3/2007, L1, page 128)];b) If yes, is the EPO obliged in accordance with the Decision to inform the representative that an authorisation has not been… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
[…] (b) Small firms/companies […] (c) Large firms/companies In J 9/86 the board was of the opinion that in a large firm where a large number of dates had to be monitored at any given time, it was normally to be expected that at least one effective cross-check was built into the system […].The relevant content of the “Case Law” publication[5.2.2] The applicant’s representative pointed out that the publication “Case Law” (in its German… [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
§ 2261A(2)(B)). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
EVANS, Appellee. 5th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Qualified domestic relations order -- 401(k) -- Valuation -- In calculating one-half share of husband's 401(k) plan to be awarded to wife under terms of mediated settlement, trial court erred in including value of outstanding loans taken out by former husband to support parties' lifestyle -- Including outstanding loan balances in amount to be distributed to former wife would result in inequitable… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm
Section 106(k)(1)(F) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: `(F) $9,350,028,000 for fiscal year 2010. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 6:49 am
See 8 CFR 214.2(h)(1)(ii)(A) and (B). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:43 am
Augle n/k/a Marie B. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Paragraph K of the arbitration award requires plaintiff to immediately withdraw all civil court proceedings, including the order of protection. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am
Kucina, K. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
[Why would ability to circumvent matter there? [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 2:55 am
Myron O. and Myron C. have asserted a disturbing lack of knowledge and information as to crucial financial, organizational, and other Company matters, despite Myron O. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Rev. 629-648 (2010).GREAT LAKES.Kilbert, Kenneth K. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:35 pm
In the proceeding, evidence may be presented as to any matter that the court deems relevant to the nature of the crime and the character of the defendant and shall include matters relating to any of the aggravating or mitigating circumstances enumerated in subsections (5) and (6). [read post]
