Search for: "MDL Panel"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 10:03 am
Defense attorneys filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:33 am
Plaintiff’s lawyer in the Iowa class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:20 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers in 8 of the Northern District of California class actions filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:29 am
Defense attorneys for several of the defendants – specifically, Zimmer Holdings, Zimmer, Inc., Stryker Corp., Biomet, DePuy Orthopaedics and/or DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Smith & Nephew plc and Smith & Nephew, Inc., id., at *1 n.2 – filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2007, 6:25 am
Plaintiffs’ lawyers in four of the Northern District actions filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:43 pm
It was a good panel. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Defense attorneys for six of the defendants moved the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) for centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
The MDL Panel then transfers the cases to the MDL transferee district. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 12:56 pm
Plaintiffs in the three class actions pending in Massachusetts filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class action lawsuits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 5:52 am
In response to a motion to centralize that litigation, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) held in part that “centralization under Section 1407 was necessary in order to eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings (particularly with respect to matters involving national security),” and transferred the class action cases to the Northern District of California. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 6:14 am
Lawyers for all plaintiffs in the separate class action lawsuits filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:28 am
When District Court Finds Signatory to a Written Arbitration Agreement is Equitably Estopped from Avoiding Arbitration with a Nonsignatory, the Writing Requirement of Section 16 of the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) is Satisfied Thereby Permitting Court of Appeals to Consider Interlocutory Appeal Second Circuit Holds After more than twenty class action lawsuits were filed against VISA, MasterCard and their member banks alleging a conspiracy to fix fees for conversion of foreign currencies in… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
(Class action notice) (12/9/06)Colacicco appellate briefs (12/8/06)MDL Panel statistics on mass torts (12/8/06)Heedless use of heeding preemptions (12/8/06) Interlocutory appeals in MDLs (12/7/06)Choice of law in class actions (St. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 12:51 pm
Plaintiffs’ lawyers in the Connecticut and Illinois class actions moved the Judicial Panel filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the five class action lawsuits pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 12:17 pm
. § 1407 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Holds Three class action lawsuits were filed in California and Pennsylvania against various defendants involving crankshaft products liability. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:50 am
Plaintiff's lawyer in one of the Pennsylvania class actions filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; defense attorneys for the common defendant (CertainTeed) supported the motion. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:16 am
Also, the district court rejected a request by the two Milberg Weiss partners in charge of the MDL class action litigation, Michael M. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 11:37 pm
Once the MDL Panel began remanding cases for trial, the home courts began ruling on motions for summary judgment. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:06 am
. § 1407 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Holds Three class action lawsuits were filed in Indiana and California against New Century Financial, New Century Mortgage and Home123; Indiana plaintiffs' lawyer moved the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) to centralize the lawsuits for pretrial purposes in the Northern District of Indiana, but then moved to withdraw the request "asserting that they have reached an… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
Plaintiffs in a California class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) to centralize the lawsuits for pretrial purposes in the Central District of California, where four of the class action cases already were pending and where Plantronics is headquartered; defense attorneys and plaintiffs’ lawyers supported the request. [read post]
