Search for: "MORRIS v. WELLS" Results 1061 - 1078 of 1,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 2:11 am
However, Lawrence is a true exception and he adds a different dimension to the Court of Appeal in at least two respects.Firstly (and most importantly), his learning and expertise in international law – a result of many years practice in the area as well being general editor of Dicey Morris & Collins – will be a real asset for the court. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
PD Stuff is primarily a news service, with excerpts from articles and/or blogs about public/indigent defense and related subjects, as well as a daily listing of the public defender blogs with new posts since the previous morning's list.And now on with theCarnivalHosting Blawg Review on MLK Day is a very special honor for me. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 7:00 am
"Important venue reforms passed by the West Virginia Legislature in 2003 were struck down this year," Cohen said, referring to the state Supreme Court decision in Morris v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 7:58 pm
The failure to ratify the New Deal, as well as other important aspects of the contemporary constitutional system, throug [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:27 am
And based on the oral argument, possibly not the last.In a highly watched case, Philip Morris v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Dean Morris, L.L.P., 444 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. 2006); Bush v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 7:07 am
That's because this morning, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Philip Morris v. [read post]
10 Sep 2006, 8:50 am
  The attorney, whose name is Morris R. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
Justin Kruger of New York University and Nicholas Epley of the University of Chicago focused on how well sarcasm is detected in electronic messages. [read post]
19 May 2006, 3:14 am
" In a well reasoned and articulated concurrence, Judge Clay wrote:The majority opinion cites United States v. [read post]