Search for: "Marketing Concepts, Inc." Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 4:37 am by AdamSmith1776
Law Firm, Inc.: The classic law firm IPO, floating itself on the market. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Companies like Data Resources, Inc. and Chase Econometrics were being quoted uncritically in major news sources. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Without the incentives of market competition and the risk of infringement motivating public officials' decisions to challenge patents, the risk of arbitrary or politically motivated enforcement actions seems high. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
Neil pens this lovely Christmas post about IP and “Pet Rocks”, a vintage toy consisting of a smooth stones from Mexico's Rosarito Beach marketed like live pets. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:00 pm by daniel
Too often, the Patent Office reviews applications without ever looking at real world software and hands out broad, vague, or obvious patents on software concepts. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm by Ben
Then someone else takes the idea, has a marketing budget, and suddenly has a popular game because they ripped off someone else's idea. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 1:19 pm by WIMS
 [#Toxics]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:24 am
As the use of the “Maestro SWISS” sign and the marketing plans related thereto were intended to communicate a Swiss connection, such use could not be assumed as having been made in good faith, regardless of whether it started before or after the GIA’s birth. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:42 pm by Unknown
A veteran of the technology, media, and entertainment industries, Ron has been at the forefront of numerous innovative business concepts -  as both an attorney and business leader for startups as well as Fortune 100 companies such as Intel and Toshiba. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
In any event, the Court found that those elements do not suffice to counterbalance the clear differences existing between the conflicting marks on a conceptual level.In addition, the Court noted that the marks did not share the concept of a ‘fruit with a bite taken out of it’ [So, what you're saying is we can have an apple but we can't take a bite out of it? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 13 C 1850, slip op. [read post]