Search for: "Matter of Complaint Against Smith"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 2:39 am
[Update: See also the latter half of this ATL piece for more on Simmons (and another accusation of discrimination, this time against Reed Smith)] Related posts:The Month in Layoffs – October 09 Did We Correctly Predict the Impending Layoffs? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
Her Majesty’s Advocate against Mr & Mrs Sheridan The News of the World has at last won its vendetta against a left wing politician. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm
Assuming, arguendo, that its complaint here constituted its disclaimer, it was untimely as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
As Professor Burch points out in her post, the pending Smith v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
His post focussed on the advantages and disadvantages of the Protective Costs Order regime in this communication; but the complaints ranged more broadly, covering lack of substantive review in procedures for judicial review, the very wide discretion enjoyed by judges in determining the allocation of costs, the lack of rights of action against private individuals for breaches of environmental laws and the restrictive time limits for judicial review. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
Her complaint said that this October, she received a call from “various governmental entities inquiring about her knowledge as to certain matters” she worked on while at the firm. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Vast powers have been given to the Commission to deal with the complaints or information leading to invocation of the provisions of Sections 3 and 4 read with Section 19 of the Act. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
The Plaintiff then applied to this Court stating that the Defendant had suppressed the fact of having filed the aforesaid action in Arizona and prayed for an injunction against Defendant from proceeding with the said action in the Arizona courts particularly since the suit of this court was prior action. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
The matter was stayed by Mrs Justice Sharp on 22 October 2010 but has now been listed for trial. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
The general rule against prior restraint in defamation has survived the HRA: Greene v Associated Newspapers [2005] QB 972. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
Consider the first things they did in the case: file a third-party complaint against Dr. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Therefore, as a matter of apparent first impression, the District Court of Appeal held that the defendant was not a "wrongfully incarcerated person" entitled to compensation under the Victims of Wrongful Incarceration Compensation Act. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:11 am
We will vigorously defend ourselves in this matter. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:38 am
Smith When law and mercy clash, on which side does right fall? [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
We are trying to work through some personal matters. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:15 am
The Washington Post reports on a civil suit against Girls Gone Wild founder Joe Francis, one of many filed against him. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
The failure to make a demand before filing a lawsuit against a Delaware corporation resulted in the dismissal on Friday in Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
The Press Gazette reports that Lady Justice Smith granted the applicant permission to appeal. [read post]
