Search for: "Matter of Kent"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 12:50 am
The government sought added penalties because Kent refused to turn on his co-defendant, Blank wrote. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
This matter has received coverage from the Independent, Press Gazette, CNBC, Publishing Perspectives and Business Insider. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
Kent Newmyer, John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court (2007). [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am
Absolute debt matters, true. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Criminal dispositions on false statements matters in internal investigations are exceptionally rare. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am
Absolute debt matters, true. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Christopher Buccafusco, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/Benjamin N. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
There is a post about the case by Jack of Kent entitled “The Stunning Mark Lewis Libel Claim” which includes the full Particulars of Claim. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:06 pm
There are two possible justifications I can think of for continuing to give political speech, or speech on matters of public concern, a privileged place in First Amendment law. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:25 pm
I learn through Paul H. that there is an interesting exchange between Kent Greenawalt and Marci Hamilton in the latest issue of the Cardozo Law Review. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
However, some courts have held that moving for summary judgment (unsuccessfully of course) is a different matter and does cause a waiver. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
(Boundy.2018.BadGuidance) Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
In most cases, courts defer to the college on matters of academic integrity. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
Conclusion “It matters not,” New York Times v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
His veto of a ban on executing the mentally retarded has had little effect, given the Supreme Court’s conclusion that “evolving standards of decency” require such a ban as a matter of constitutional law. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm
A second key brief in the set was filed by a group of law professors led by Professors Lemley (Stanford); Reilly (Kent); and Rai (Duke). [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Would ideas of fair use, more robust printed matter doctrine, more robust abstract idea doctrine help? [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC was of course involved in the ensuing major drug- and device-specific Supreme Court preemption cases – win or lose: Lohr, Buckman, Riegel, Kent, Levine, etc.Take Daubert. [read post]
