Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:22 am
I'm not sure that one-size-fits-all works beyond the constitutional floor. [read post]
18 May 2019, 3:10 am
The Court, referring to its judgments in Ahmet Yıldırım v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:17 pm
As a practical matter, Mr. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
[I should note I think the Office is completely right in saying (1) §43(a)(1)(B) claims should survive Dastarwhere false attributions are material to consumers and (2) Dastar applies to in-copyright works as well. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Thomas M. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:27 am
This result also makes sense to me as a policy matter. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Real pomegranate juice matters; taste is important; nutrition is importantSurvey about role of price versus health versus taste. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:05 am
That’s a totally different matter. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
But causality is difficult b/c there are so many breaches—even if you experience identity theft, which breach led to that theft? [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
B/c the contribution to the joint tort car accident is a one-off, it may not transfer well. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
SPDC has contributed financially to the payments to these witnesses and / or [c.] [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:20 am
Machines (panelists from Facebook, Wikimedia, and Yelp) Session C: In-sourcing to Employees vs. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
While claiming to merely “clarify” its prior precedents on the matter, and acknowledging no major break with the longstanding Arthur Andersen fee-factors framework, the Texas high court will have accomplished much more. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:15 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction in this patent infringement case involving graphical representations of information. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
Brown, Kenneth M. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
B. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 2:02 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see 25 USC ' 1911[b]). [read post]
