Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
I finally had a chance to read the amici brief of constitutional law professors urging the Supreme Court to review the Seventh Circuit's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:48 am by Adam R. Long
Burke, Jr. of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas certified a class of 2,380 former or current employees of a McDonald’s franchisee in Luzerne County in the class action case captioned as Siciliano et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:32 am
[LA Times; WaPo; Bashman; Perfect 10 v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 12:10 pm
McDonalds Restaurants where the plaintiff was severely burned and injured when coffee from McDonald's was spilled in her lap. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:37 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
The Second Amendment case is out: Erin: Alito announces McDonald v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am by Walter Olson
” [James Taranto] Tags: AAJ, banks, constitutional law, harassment law, hot coffee, international law, mortgages, New Jersey, North Carolina, traffic laws, workers' compensation Related posts February 15 roundup (4) August 31 roundup (1) Yet another McDonald’s coffee style lawsuit (5) Worker’s comp: trauma over visitor’s remark (0) Urban legends and Stella Liebeck and the McDonald’s coffee case (23) [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Time] Rest of the Economist article is of interest too, especially on ADA filing mills in Florida and elsewhere; In Sheehan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:47 am
[Chris Fountain, For What It's Worth] “Religious group sued for allegedly inciting harm through prayers” [USA Today] Legally driven waste of water in parched California should reopen Endangered Species Act debate [Max Schulz, American Spectator] “More Unintended Consequences — Endangered Species Edition” [Ronald Bailey, Reason; related AEI panel] “Apple v Woolworth re Apple Logos In Australia” [Trademark Blog] … [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:14 am by Joe Price
For instance, the infamous “Hot Coffee” case (formally known as Liebeck v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:01 am by Sean Wajert
 For example, the group cites the Massachusetts law (93A), but the recent case Rule v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
And Justice McDonald helpfully explains why.I'm on board with that, I guess. [read post]