Search for: "Means v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 61,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am by Steve Vladeck
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to depart from N v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 31 by reference to the ECtHR decision in Paposhvili v Belgium [2017] Imm AR 867 and to remit his application for rehearing by reference to article 3. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court in considering the fair and proper sentence may look at offences which the defendant was not convicted for as stated in Williams v New York. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:58 am by Eugene R. Fidell
As readers who have not already made up their mind ponder what the verdict means for where (if anywhere, as that too is an option to some) the so-called "high value detainees" such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed should be tried and who bears responsibility for what many view as an unsatisfying outcome despite the 20-years-to-life sentence Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm by Josh Blackman
That's the idea championed by the late Justice Antonin Scalia that the intentions of the framers should determine the meaning of the Constitution. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:03 am by Edward B. Foley
It would be ironic indeed if the very first time the court felt obligated to expound upon the meaning of Bush v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:51 am by The Federalist Society
On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]