Search for: "Mr. X"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
I agree that a judge may highlight a possible anomaly in the law, or possible unintended consequences of legislation, and even state that the law should be changed (as happened in the X. case). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:09 am
The pictured apartment building on Franklin Street in Brooklyn was acquired in 1991 by Mr. and Mrs. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:05 am
Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
” Mr. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
In August 2011 Mrs. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:09 am
Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
In addition to x-rays, Mr. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:05 pm
The total loss would be £(56.62 – 33.48) x 3600 = £83,304. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:33 pm
Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:38 pm
Edward X. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:12 am
On November 11, 1992, Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
” The domestic cases in which the X v UK test had been accepted were cases in which the point had not been argued. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:24 am
Mr. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
When I asked them who paid the legal fees of then Crown Attorney Casey Hill, now Mr. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:59 pm
” Edward X. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:08 pm
And then … “I explained to Mr. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:45 pm
"The subject matter may, in fact, be far from literature," Mr. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
These kinds of impulses, and the arguable leverage opportunities that one might perceive arise, exist at the borders of zealous advocacy and other ethical rules do fix a kind of frontier that cannot safely be crossed - ultimately, it is the attorney for the client who needs to make the correct executive decision for them both because, as Davenport demonstrates, attorneys too can wind up footing the bill in terms of sanctions or fees caused by getting lost in what Mr. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:26 pm
In trying to figure out how Mr. [read post]
