Search for: "NIXON v. STATE" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” (Reminiscent of Richard Nixon’s Watergate-era speech in which he said, “I am not a crook. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Quoting an article by Felix Frankfurter from 1916, and also citing Ernst Freund, Post states that Progressives had repudiated Lochner v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Laurence H. Tribe
To compound that problem, Chesebro uses that proposition as support for the myth that the way Hawaii’s electoral votes were counted for Kennedy over Nixon in the 1960 presidential election “buttresses” my supposed “conclusion” and thereby supports this imagined power of each State in the election process. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
” However, Cannon appeared troubled by the “limitless” nature of the appropriations, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
In other words, Nixon was trying to subvert the established procedures of the Justice Department. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Last month, Governor Jay Nixon of Missouri postponed an execution after the European Union threatened to cut off shipments of propofol, a common surgical anesthetic, if the state moved forward with its plan to use the drug in its new lethal injection procedure. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
” Note that no such privilege is accorded to the President of the United States and that, even when it is accorded, to members of the House and Senate, an exception is made for felonies. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
(Should we automatically be more deferential to lawyer-presidents like Richard Nixon or Bill Clinton?) [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]