Search for: "Patent & Trademark Office" Results 1061 - 1080 of 14,517
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
However, both the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit  (CAFC) maintained that US patent laws require a human inventor, and as a result, they refused to consider Thaler’s patent application. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 20 seeking comments on proposed changes to America Invents Act trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 20 seeking comments on proposed changes to America Invents Act trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 20 seeking comments on proposed changes to America Invents Act trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 20 seeking comments on proposed changes to America Invents Act trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 20 seeking comments on proposed changes to America Invents Act trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 20 seeking comments on proposed changes to America Invents Act trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:35 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office) - 10:30 am to 3:30 pm (ET), Alexandria, VA April 25, 2023 - "Using Disclaimers at the EPO: A Practical Guide" (J A Kemp) - 16:00 pm (BST) April 25, 2023 - "Women and Intellectual Property: Accelerating Innovation and Creativity" (IPWatchdog and IP.com) - 12:00 pm (ET) April 26, 2023 - "MentorshIP: The secret sauce for women entrepreneurs" (U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:26 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office will be holding a listening session to seek stakeholder input on the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and inventorship issues that may arise in view of the advancement of such technologies. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:23 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office will be offering its next Women's Entrepreneurship (WE) event from 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm (ET) on April 26, 2023 at the USPTO Headquarters in Alexandria, VA. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:20 am by Alec Pronk
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Six former IP leaders send comments to the European Commission expressing concerns over an “apparent pivot” on EU policy relating to standard essential patents (SEPs); the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property holds a hearing on competition threats to U.S. innovation; the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) asks for public input on proposed changes to discretionary institution… [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:20 am by Alec Pronk
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Six former IP leaders send comments to the European Commission expressing concerns over an “apparent pivot” on EU policy relating to standard essential patents (SEPs); the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property holds a hearing on competition threats to U.S. innovation; the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) asks for public input on proposed changes to discretionary institution… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
But, the appellate court affirmed, holding that the Office was correct to focus attention on the dominant portion of the mark. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:17 am by Holly
You should not submit physical evidence to the United State Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), but instead, take a picture, scan, or copy the physical specimen so you can transmit it electronically to the USPTO. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:30 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) indicating it is considering changes to America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:30 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) indicating it is considering changes to America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal said in an Order filed yesterday in IPR2021-01229 between Patent Quality Assurance (PQA)/Intel and VLSI Technology that VLSI’s reference in its Rehearing Request to an “unsolicited, anonymous, and improper ex parte communication” about the relationship between PQA and Intel that Vidal had put under seal has put VLSI on thin ice and in danger of being sanctioned. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal said in an Order filed yesterday in IPR2021-01229 between Patent Quality Assurance (PQA)/Intel and VLSI Technology that VLSI’s reference in its Rehearing Request to an “unsolicited, anonymous, and improper ex parte communication” about the relationship between PQA and Intel that Vidal had put under seal has put VLSI on thin ice and in danger of being sanctioned. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm by Florian Mueller
Haier reasons to enjoin; they could still require implementers to take global portfolio licenses to huge patent pools even if they are held to infringe only one patent. [read post]