Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
The clerk is enforcing Kentucky law as written by its people represented through its legislature, not as five unelected jurists in black robes say by fiat that Kentucky law must be.The Supreme Court's majority opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Davis has again refused to issues marriage licenses to same-sex couples. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Weighing in on one of the most important digital privacy rights cases of the year, EFF is asking the court to hear arguments in Davis v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
Burke, Dan Laidman, and Diana Palacios of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP for winning the case. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Yesterday in Miller v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Within hours of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
The Fourth Circuit just decided United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:14 am
Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm
And such a ruling appears contrary to the California Constitution, which not only mandates that the public has a constitutional right to government records but also requires that statutes and other authorities, such as the law involved in our case, “shall be broadly construed if they further the people’s right of access, and narrowly construed if they limit the right of access. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
