Search for: "People v. Deem" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wade (1973) (as later limited by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The government has sought to resolve this tension in this fashion: People who are subject to an entry ban should not be issued a visa, for such an act would be futile. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 12:42 am
QUEENS COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Is Deemed Second Violent Felony Offender Despite Certificate of Disposition People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil RightsTax Returns Deemed Irrelevant in False Arrest, Malicious Prosecution Action; Subpoena Quashed Ellis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
New York Stock Exchange KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Marital Exception to Third Degree Sexual Abuse Unconstitutional; Defendants Denied Dismissal People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:53 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
This past April, when an image of a fourth-grade science quiz on dinosaurs went viral, many people did not believe it was real. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 2:00 am by Neil Cahn
Corp., 121 A.D.2d 956, 960, 505 N.Y.S.2d 607 (1st Dep’t 1986) (noting contextual usage of word ‘including’ not term of limitation but rather illustrative); People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am by Venkat
Rowan involved a statute which allowed people to opt-out from mailings which the recipients deemed obscene and which were sent through the postal service. [read post]