Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 39,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Murthy v Missouri may become a landmark Supreme Court case in which the justices are led astray on the basis of a disinformation-laden record. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
Sure, Troy may well be convicted again at a trial in which the facts are accurately explained. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:44 pm
A recent New Jersey Supreme Court Case, State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Divorced retiree may enroll his or her new spouse for dependent coverage in the retiree’s health insurance plan as provided by the CBAGiblin v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 06133, Decided on July 15, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentWhen William Giblin retired from his position with the Village of Johnson City, he continued his individual and dependent health insurance for himself and his then-wife pursuant to the terms of the relevant collective… [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:55 am
There may have been better ways of doing what went down here; in particular, the judge should have made sure to invite back the people waiting out in the hall as seats became available.But that doesn't mean that defendant gets a retrial. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:34 am
In Goodby v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 1:51 am
As the folks at Recording Industry v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The post Kylie v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
But I'd still say, at least upon first glance, that the crime's not "over" until X leaves the house, even though it may be "complete" upon initial entry. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:19 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
King v. [read post]
25 May 2025, 12:11 am
EHRC: consultation following For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers The Equality and Human Rights Commission has opened a consultation on its code of practice for services, public functions and associations, to gather feedback on the changes that it has made to the code following the UK Supreme Court judgment on 16 April 2025 in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers: “We acknowledge the importance of these changes to people with the protected… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
Today’s Miami Herald presents a fun legal puzzle for the morning in You may be able to buy Powerball tickets online: Have the purveyors of LottoGopher managed to find a loophole in Champion v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Even if people who were merely arrested for minor offenses -- and may not even be guilty of anything -- were forced to undergo invasive and humiliating strip searches for no real benefit. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Canada On 9 May 2023, the plaintiff’s motion for a Norwich order was dismissed by Morgan J in the case of Jacobs v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Which is not only wrong, but is particularly interesting since you used to be the person in charge of section of the Minnesota Department of Human Services that ensured that other people paid their child support. [read post]
