Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 4,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 4:16 am
He supports his position by pointing to the odds of winning, together with the egregious decision in People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:36 pm
Recently, in Yiyu Lin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:56 am
Ford and Panetti say incompetent people can’t be executed. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am
Because her prescription was filled with the generic, however, the SCOTUS decision rendered her without recourse to seek damages against Pliva, Inc., as well as setting legal precedent that prevents future action on behalf of people injured by generic drugs. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
Accolade, Sony v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
Section 195 embodies a machinery that would render tax collection effective and must be construed to effectuate the charge of tax. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 4:04 am
A divorce case unwinds the matters of two people who were together for years. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:48 pm
In Lopez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:32 am
In a decision this week,Decker v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm
Cheryl Thurston lived in a group home facility operated by New York State’s Office for People with Developmental Disabilities. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm
In the case, Picard v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
But that does not, in and of itself, render the entire case meritless. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Jarkesy, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:39 am
First, that the solitary confinement of any person under 18 automatically violates article 3 of the Convention; or, alternatively, that such treatment can only be regarded as compatible with article 3 of the Convention if there are exceptional circumstances which render the treatment strictly necessary. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:27 am
By Chris Holman UCB, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
" But NRA v. [read post]
