Search for: "People v. Wear" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 5:57 am by Regan Zambri & Long
People tend to be very bad at judging how seriously alcohol affects them. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
However, the scope, duration and intensity of a seizure, and any subsequent search, “remain subject to the strictures of article I, §12, and judicial review” (People v Troiano, 35 NY2d 476 [1974]; People v Marsh, 20 NY2d 98 [1967]). [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am by Lyle Denniston
” Varsity Brands has for years dominated the market for cheerleader uniforms and warm-up clothing as sports wear. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:22 am by Lisa Stam
  Context Does Matter People often describe online comments as having the same exposure as an employee shouting out comments in the hallways of the workplace. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
Lee" or by the Supreme Court's decision in Texas v White. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I assume that the purpose to harm a person's reputation would qualify under the "purpose[] of harming" language; compare People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
During the relationship, Nadia emailed several pictures of herself to Patel that showed her topless and wearing only underwear. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:50 am by SHG
  Under the 9th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Mike Mooy
One of the better known Canadian EDR related cases is R. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by Eugene Volokh
They may have released what she was wearing or what he is wearing that day and I’ll prove different. [read post]