Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 13,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 3:22 am
Though the Court of Appeals doesn’t say so explicitly in the City of Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Other states, uncertain as to the impact of the pandemic on state revenue, opted to raise taxes. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes[6], greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads[7], differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions[8], and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” on the legal product in many U.S. states.[10] International Cigarette Smuggling… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
V. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
For such a short and unanimous opinion, Jones v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
In Shell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
At the time the Ninth Circuit requested an answer in the case — Beeman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
(Halifax v HM Customs and Excise (C-255/02)) HMRC sought to recover VAT on the full sale price of the cars and charged penalties. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:19 am
Hunt v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
State corporate law has a hugely important role to play where shareholders’ need for information is not so protected. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
In Chichak v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:47 am
California Growers Association v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:11 pm
FTC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
-Corpus Christi 2003, pet. denied) (stating that a "contract for deed is an agreement by a seller to deliver a deed to property once certain conditions have been met and that it entitled the buyer to immediate possession, that the seller retains title until the purchase price is fully paid, and that the price is typically paid in installments over several years). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am
-Corpus Christi 2003, pet. denied) (stating that a "contract for deed is an agreement by a seller to deliver a deed to property once certain conditions have been met and that it entitled the buyer to immediate possession, that the seller retains title until the purchase price is fully paid, and that the price is typically paid in installments over several years). [read post]
