Search for: "Prince v. State" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court (Prince v. [read post]
Questions considered by the Supreme Court this year have included: whether depriving a dual-national of British citizenship for terrorist offences resulted in him becoming stateless, in contravention of international law (Secretary for State of the Home Department v B2 (Case Preview); whether the Prince of Wales’ letters to government ministers should be disclosed to the media (R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General (Case Preview); and whether… [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 4:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher, Michigan State University College of Law Venus McGhee Prince, Attorney General, Poarch Band of Creek Indians, Atmore, AL Alexander T. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 4:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher, Michigan State University College of Law Venus McGhee Prince, Attorney General, Poarch Band of Creek Indians, Atmore, AL Alexander T. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
The legal academy has lost a brave prince. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:07 pm by Heidi Meinzer
Even Justice Scalia has found this option to be constitutionally infirm, arguing in his dissenting opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:33 am
Case Name: Ecosystem Resources, LC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a pre-trial review in the case of Houston v Prince Paul of Romania before Hamblen J. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Prince Harry has commenced libel proceedings against the Mail on Sunday over an article claiming that he has lost touch with the Royal Marines. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
Rev. 481, 481 (2005), stating that the issue has been labeled an "Armageddon" by some and a "salvation" by others. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Susan Hennessey
It prohibits any “Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States]” from accepting “any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 8:37 am by Florian Mueller
In fact, the moment he impressed me the most was when he conceded, in a Samsung v. [read post]