Search for: "R. Held, et al. v. State, et al." Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 8:31 am by Marcus Mintz and Jeremy Cohen
Chen, et al., Case No. 22-2739 (June 5, 2024), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, albeit in a non-precedential opinion, held that statutory fee-shifting is an equitable remedy, not a legal one, and that it is therefore for the judge to determine “bad faith” as a predicate to a fee award. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:27 am
Towson Rehabilitation Center, LLC et al January 11, 2012 Related Web Resource: MD Workers' Compensation in the Courts of Appeals [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
The dissent in Loma Linda was the sole Panel in an earlier UDRP case, Loma Linda University Adventist Health Services Center, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
”  Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:53 am
” CITAK & CITAK et al., Plaintiffs, -against- THE ST. [read post]