Search for: "STATE v COOL" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
But isn’t the EEOC there to speak for the United States? [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am by Daniel Reisner
Tempers have cooled (a bit) and the media has moved on (for now), so it’s a good time to step back and assess this whole episode, what it means and what its larger importance really is. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am by admin
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Anecdotally, most cooling off periods are a maximum of twelve months and sometimes shorter. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by Nicolas Croquet
Instead, Member States would have to fix in advance indicative national energy efficiency targets in the form of absolute levels of primary energy consumption (i.e., gross inland consumption) in 2020. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:25 am by SHG
It’s not that lawyers think it’s cool to discriminate or harass. [read post]