Search for: "STATE v MURPHY"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 7:41 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 2:00 pm
Such a request is appropriate to invoke the court's inherent power to correct prior rulings under section 1008(c) and LeFrancois v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:39 am
Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:59 pm
In addition, every court to have considered the matter since the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
In the case coming to the Supreme Court, Young v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm
Century 21 Top Realty; Throckmartin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Because the district court correctly held that this case sounds in contract and not in tort, we AFFIRM the holding of the district court. 07a0407p.06 2007/10/04 Murphy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in FTC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
While we're at it, we'll note the publication of The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Murphy specifically preserved and raised the issue on appeal, an exception to the prospective-only rule should be made. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Murphy, 126 S.W. 343, 345 (Tex. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
Cal. 2020) (currently on appeal), and State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:41 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:41 am
In Lewis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 1:00 pm
I didn't check the state database. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:12 am
Lips v Older was a case presented and argued as common law negligence only, apparently without the existence of the duty being disputed.In relation to Rimmer and Targett, the Claimant argued that issue was a positive duty of the landlord not to take steps to create a dangerous state of affairs and that this remained good law despite Murphy. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
Murphy Oil. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm
That was Clarence Thomas at the Utah State Bar convention. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Smith v. [read post]
