Search for: "Self v. Laws" Results 1061 - 1080 of 17,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
  It just may be, if David Kopel at VC is correct when he writes: District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am by MBettman
It also states laws may be passed, and then only for certain purposes, so it anticipates that it is self-executing and laws need not be passed. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The Court reiterated its case law to the effect that conclusions expressed on the motives or possible intentions of a third party constituted a value judgment rather than a factual assertion lending itself to proof (Diena and Ozolins v Latvia n.16657/03 and Ungváry and Irodalom Kft v Hungary n.64520/10 considered). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:04 am
 In either respect, the law is now clear that there exists no duty to monitor the alcohol intake of guests who serve themselves such as, in this case, where patrons utilize self-serve taps on a beer truck. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Healey] Congress has never passed a law criminalizing the accessories known as bump stocks and the Executive branch can’t change that on its own [Trevor Burrus and James Knight, Guedes v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
This meant that they s 44 power was not “in accordance with the law” for the purposes of art 8. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
— the four who two years ago would have invalidated not only the individual mandate but the entire law — voted to hear King v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:08 pm
Petition for writ of certiorari was denied in Bodkin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that Florida law (unlike the law of most states) provides that defendants who claim self-defense are entitled to have their claim considered before trial, and have charges against them dropped if they show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that they were acting in self-defense. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
” The First Amendment “is not limited to traditional media, but extends to any entity that selects, arranges, and disseminates content, whether third-party or self-generated, and certainly covers entities that the government seeks to regulate because of the way they exercise their editorial discretion. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And one can even put to one side the obvious legal questions, in terms both of domestic constitutional law and international law, about such proposals with regard to immigrants and visitors. [read post]