Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 12:31 pm
Blumenthal Distributing, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
(b) “Peace officer” means any undersheriff, deputy sheriff other than one appointed with authority only to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, town marshal, or investigator for a district attorney or the attorney general who is engaged in full-time employment by the state, a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
(b) “Peace officer” means any undersheriff, deputy sheriff other than one appointed with authority only to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, town marshal, or investigator for a district attorney or the attorney general who is engaged in full-time employment by the state, a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 11:39 am
Chase Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am
Stat. 39-15-107(a)(i) and (b)(viii) requires sellers to collect and remit to the state the taxes imposed on sales of motorcycles and off-road vehicles. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
Earlier, the Supreme Court referred to Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
The case was stayed while the United States Supreme Court decided Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:39 pm
(Link to the Judgement)The United States Supreme Court had to consider in AT & T v Concepcion if class action waivers in arbitration clauses were valid. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 10:57 am
CubeSmart L.P., however, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey found that companies could use savings clauses that “attempt…to conform to New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:28 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Sellers, Assistant Director for Public Affairs, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, D.C. [read post]
