Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 4,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
After hearing argument, the court denied the motion, finding Pharis had failed to make a prima facie case for a constitutional violation because there had been no state action.State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 11:24 am
The issue to be decided in the present case is whether the substantial-federal-question doctrine provides federal subject-matter jurisdiction over a state law claim on the basis that an embedded element of the claim concerns 26 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Last week, the Department of Justice asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to refrain from taking any further action in the leading case challenging President Trump’s already infamous Executive Order (EO) 13769, which temporarily banned entry into the country by nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries and all refugees, while indefinitely banning entry of Syrian refugees. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 2:38 pm
Six of the Board’s seven voting members are selected from a list by Congress, and the seventh is selected by the President of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
If Breyer is writing in this case, it would bring him to seven opinions for the term. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
In conclusion, the unanimous court observed: Wayne Jones was killed just over one year before the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of Michael Brown would once again draw national scrutiny to police shootings of black people in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
The text of the case follows. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:13 pm
He suggested that I explore the topic of "manifest disregard" of the law in light of the United States Supreme Court decision Hall Street Associates, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:06 pm
See The Supreme Court’s next (cautious, careful) move into the digital age: "A new era of cutting-age technology begins Monday at the United States Supreme Court, as the public for the first time will be able to access briefs and other case documents on the court’s website. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
In the case of U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
LEXIS 71669 (SD MS, Aug. 14, 2009), a Mississippi federal magistrate judge rejected a challenge by a Rastafarian prisoner to the state's grooming policy that prevented him from wearing his hair in dreadlocks.In Carson v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:42 am
Facts: This case (Fleck et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm
Aside from the specific questions raised in the seven petitions, the two sides each appear to be pursuing broader agendas. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 8:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:47 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently addressed this question in Sloan v. [read post]
