Search for: "Severance v. Commonwealth" Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
Commonwealth, 277 Va. 92 (2009), severely limited the testimony of expert witnesses who rely on hearsay, particularly facts and opinions from other non-testifying experts. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:53 am by Ken Lammers
For one in particular, I looked at the note I had taken and was stumped:Mohamed v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by Paul A. Prados
 Decision here:http://www.scribd.com/doc/49899901/Liberty-v-GeithnerThis decision, although it did not gain much traction in the press, will increase in importance in the next few months. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In Australia, legislation for the protection of journalists’ sources will go before the Commonwealth parliament[3]. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm by Stephen Page
The father lodged a severity appeal which was dismissed in July 2010;In August 2010 he was convicted of two counts of common assault in relation to which he received a 12 month suspended sentence upon entering an s 12 bond for the same period to be supervised by probation and parole.In the lead up to the final stage hearing the Court encouraged the father to undertake a therapeutic program designed for perpetrators of family violence. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:44 pm by Isabel McArdle
The Applicant had several arguments to support her case that she was a victim. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm by cdw
 The Commonwealth apparently conceded that at trial counse failed to disclose evidence that the lynchpin witness of the prosecution initially indicated someone other than Mr. [read post]