Search for: "Sg." Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 7:30 am by Steve Vladeck
Even with the addition of Judge Srinavasan (who may well recuse based upon his recent stint in the SG’s Office), the government would still need to sway two Democratic appointees given that Judge Kavanaugh wrote for the majority–and was not materially constrained by prior circuit precedent–in Hamdan II. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
  At long last, the SG has reported the results of his ruminations, urging that although the First Circuit’s decision was erroneous, cert. should be denied because deciding the issue now would be premature. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm by Adam Kolber
Commenter SG raised questions about whether trolley problems do a good job of testing our intuitions. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am by Thomas Merrill
  Counsel for the petitioner Texas water district, Charles Rothfeld, is an alum of the SG’s office, as is Lisa Blatt, counsel for the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Relations, 2013 NY Slip Op 02445, Appellate Division, Third Department Kevin Ashby was employed as a correction sergeant, SG 17, by the NYS Department of Corrections and Community Supervision [DOCCS]. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Fort
The SG’s admittedly confusing position of claiming 1912(d) applies (what we know as active efforts, what Blatt characterized as an “exhaustion obligation” (page 8, line 11) and what Justice Kagan called the “curing provision” (page 58, line 14)), but 1912(f) does not (the heightened standard for termination of parental rights), the government may have done more harm than good. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The SG’s admittedly confusing position of claiming 1912(d) applies (what we know as active efforts, what Blatt characterized as an “exhaustion obligation” (page 8, line 11) and what Justice Kagan called the “curing provision” (page 58, line 14)), but 1912(f) does not (the heightened standard for termination of parental rights), the government may have done more harm than good. [read post]
Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Eilis Ferran, Professor of Company and Securities Law, and Valia SG Babis, both at University of Cambridge. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:05 pm by Timothy D. Lytton
Moreover, in 2009, the OU partnered with SGS—a private inspection, verification, testing and certification company—to begin providing dual kosher and food safety certification. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm by Rory Little
”   Feigin noted that the SG had originally recommended against cert., and he then “freely” conceded “that the guidelines are very influential” on federal sentences. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
This is a probably a disappointment for the petitioners — it would be a major surprise if the SG recommends a grant. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:52 pm by Patent Docs
The request is not unusual or controversial -- but the apportionment of argument time requested by the SG is. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Most recently, the Court also ignored the SG's opinion not to grant certiorari in Bowman v Monsanto... [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:54 am
Having a customer continue to use the software for another year probably incurs little or no SG&A expense, yet the licensor usually demands more money. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm by Kedar S. Bhatia
I might be more hesitant to include someone who served in a state SG office during the relevant period, but no advocate in the top ten raised that problem. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
His – there has never been a female SG – is a continuous balancing act, serving the interests of multiple constituencies which did not elect him. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
On March 26 and 27, the Court will hear oral argument in the same-sex marriage cases, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm by Steven Matthews
The SGs are, in turn, organizing their response, and one would assume a claim of opposition. [read post]