Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am by SHG
Compare Stevens, 559 U.S. at 467, 482 (upholding the lower court’s strict scrutiny analysis using the overbreadth doctrine) with United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
There also is the United States Coast Guard, which is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:00 am by ACLU
It’s a long-established fact that the United States is the largest incarcerator in the world. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Article 29 Working Party has this week issued guidance surrounding EU-US Privacy Shield (Privacy Shield) related complaints. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:34 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Among those assets was Urban, an Illinois limited partnership which owned high-end retail shopping centers all over the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:34 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Among those assets was Urban, an Illinois limited partnership which owned high-end retail shopping centers all over the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:22 am
  But Justices Brennan and Marshall relentlessly dissented in every death penalty case, and Justice John Marshall Harlan was the lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
” In its petition for certiorari, DG argued that the Fourth Circuit’s decision conflicts with United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:14 am by SHG
United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), whereby a defendant must “unambiguously” invoke his rights in order to cut off questioning, Plugh I, 576 F.3d at 142-43. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Over the course of a long career as a civil rights and criminal defense lawyer, I have spent a great deal of time in a great many state, federal, and military prisons in the United States and her colonial outposts in Guantanamo and Iraq. [read post]