Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 12:17 pm
United States considers constitutional limits to military courts’ jurisdiction over retired servicemembers. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 11:09 pm
Both in Roe and in the earlier case of United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
For example, Amazon argued that it did not set the price for third-party products and therefore cannot “spread the cost of defects across units sold. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
[What the Supreme Court should do in 303 Creative v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:02 am
Over at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr posts about a decision, State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:47 am
Calrton, 512 U.S. 26 (1994) and United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:24 am
At CJA, Natasha investigated and litigated Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act cases against perpetrators of human rights abuses found living in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:01 pm
No, WDNY Judge Larimer, holds in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:24 am
This is the result of a decision the New York City-based United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued on May 25, 2012 in the matter USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:35 am
United States is available here: [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:18 am
A Prawfs public service announcement--over at the Law Librarian Blog, Joe Hodnicki writes:When the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 12:44 pm
The government argued that under the Sovereign Acts Doctrine actions taken by the United States in its sovereign capacity shielded it from contractual liability for those acts, including the actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 12:46 pm
The Post says that the coalition’s “effort to hold specific board members responsible represents a new militancy in the fight to require companies to reveal their political activities,” which has grown out of the aftermath of the high court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
Facebook (Case No. 5:11-cv-01726), United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Lucy H. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:21 am
United States, Justice Sotomayor explained that a resentencing court could take into account post-sentencing rehabilitation. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:10 am
In CDX Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:13 pm
In our case Sabbithi v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
State of California (2023) 98 Cal. [read post]
