Search for: "Standard v. U. S"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
" To be sure, he notes that the protections Congress has established for CSLI in 47 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:48 am
This morning in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:22 am
” 8 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:05 am
In Trump v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(2) Is the district court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Graham, 383 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:41 am
Justice Dufficy’s ruling in Matter of Kassab v Kasab, 2018 NY Slip Op 50934(U) [Sup Ct Queens County June 11, 2018], comes on the heels of a post-trial decision last year in a related case brought by Nissim in which Justice Dufficy conditionally ordered dissolution of their corporation known as Corner 160 Associates, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm
Jones, 565 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
The Supreme Court of Florida has set forth the standard of review for a Petition for Writ of Certiorari such as the one before this Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
In Quill, the Court explored the substantial nexus requirement of the dormant Commerce Clause and concluded that the substantial nexus standard was different than the minimum contacts standard for the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause and held that for use tax collection purposes, substantial nexus required an in-state physical presence.[6] Because the Court never articulated a substantial nexus standard, which the exception of the narrow… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
S. 298, and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v Mansky, 585 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Harrison, 16-1094 (in which the court requested the SG’s views) and Kumar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:34 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Grussing v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:55 am
” Judge Leon then laid out the government’s theory of market harm from a merger: that when Time Warner negotiates with rivals of AT&T’s MVPDs (DirecTV, DirecTVNow and AT&T U-Verse), it would have anti-competitive leverage over the rivals allowing it to either charge supra-competitive rates or to withhold the programming from the rivals entirely. [read post]
