Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 1:58 pm
On appeal, the court stated a demurrer is to be sustained when the complaint does not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action or when the court does not have jurisdiction over the subject of the cause of action. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Accordingly, the Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion and remanded the action to the Superior Court of California, San Francisco County. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:44 am
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 944 (“Grafton”)), in most instances forum selection and choice-of-law provisions have been respected by California courts. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:06 pm
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal. 4th 944 (“Grafton”)), in most instances forum selection and choice-of-law provisions have been respected by California courts. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:25 am
Superior Court of San Diego County, No. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
- Gideon Kanner's takedown of the recent California Court of Appeal decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm
Superior Court (Rahm, et al, Real Parties), 2012 Cal. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:14 pm
The district court held that California law governed the contract. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:33 pm
Walnut Producers of California v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:06 am
Superior Court [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm
Williams-Sonoma * California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) * Ninth Circuit: FACTA Does not Cover Emailed Receipts — Simonoff v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Superior Court and In re Tobacco II Cases, inapplicable to the plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
5 May 2016, 2:26 pm
The case we always cite in California is Stangvik v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:03 am
Superior Court (pdf), where the California Supreme Court determined that pre-dispute jury trial waivers violate the state's constitution) there was initially some confusion as to how best to get around the prohibition on these kinds of waivers. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
Roth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Specifically, Superior Court Judge Ernest Goldsmith stated that CARB "seeks to create a fait accompli by premature establishment of the cap-and-trade program before alternative [sic] can be exposed to public comment and properly evaluated by the [CARB] itself. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:13 pm
Superior Court, 178 Cal. [read post]
