Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota has dismissed with prejudice a putative class action antitrust lawsuit brought in Washington v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
On June 13, 2012, the California Supreme Court unanimously denied review in the case of California Society of Anesthesiologists v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:14 pm
The race to the courthouse is illustrated by a recent decision from the federal District Court for the District of Minnesota, St. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:41 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
On March 10, 2011, Anne filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage, in which she sought custody of M.A.A. and E.T.A., in Minnesota state court in Ramsey County. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:59 am
Supreme Court’s 1972 summary affirmance in Baker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
District Court of Minnesota just one day after that court upheld NFL sanctions against the Cowboys and the Redskins for front-loading player contracts in 2010. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA “The evidence in the record does not compel findings contrary to those made by USCIS. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court decision, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
And if our district offices were pursuing those things, we would have a fit about it. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am
The Baker decision upheld a state supreme court ruling upholding the man-and-woman-only marriage law in Minnesota, finding that the challenge did not raise “a substantial federal question.”The First Circuit said that lower courts like it remain bound by the Baker ruling. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:51 am
The decision is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:08 am
A Minnesota Court recently addressed this question. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:34 pm
ENNENGA v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:25 pm
District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging that they violated the FCA by misrepresenting the country of origin of products that were sold to the government through the GSA Advantage! [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:34 am
Minnesota v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:38 am
A federal district court in New York recently explained the analytical difficulties (Birkholz v City of New York, EDNY 2012). [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:26 pm
The district court held that 26 U.S.C. [read post]
