Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 1061 - 1080 of 3,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a constitutional challenge to the federal ban on sports betting, “New Jersey is the favorite and the sports league quintet are heavy underdogs. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm by Stefanie Ramirez
New Jersey has attempted to legalize sports betting since 2011, when voters passed a referendum calling for the state to legalize sports betting. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:53 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
The United States Supreme Court issued a major decision on tolling the statute of limitations on state law claims while the case is in federal court which has significant impact on New Jersey employment litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Gene Killian
As one of the lawyers at our firm, Ryan Milun, put it, suppose you’re driving down the New Jersey Turnpike with your six-year-old in the backseat, and he (or she) says: “Dad (or Mom), can we go to Six Flags? [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Gene Killian
As one of the lawyers at our firm, Ryan Milun, put it, suppose you’re driving down the New Jersey Turnpike with your six-year-old in the backseat, and he (or she) says: “Dad (or Mom), can we go to Six Flags? [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
  The story continues.Cuba Criticizes US Senate Hearing on Attacks on Diplomats HAVANA TIMES – The Cuban government questioned today the validity of the hearing held in the United States Senate on Tuesday over the alleged acoustic attacks on US diplomats in Havana, and restated its denial of having any responsibility in the events, reported dpa news. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:00 am by David Hartley
Oct. 10, 2017), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied both Princeton Ophthalmic (“Plaintiff’s”) partial motion for summary judgment as to the first and third elements of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10(b)(5) promulgated thereunder and Corinthian Ophthalmic, board members Drs. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript’s second new graphic explainer covers Byrd v. [read post]