Search for: "State v. Bolds"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
This is not normally how settlements are done – even at the Copyright Board.The deal represents about a 50% (or even an 800% based upon the existing minimum rate) increase over the current rates, which should have gone significantly down rather than up after the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:50 am
To obtain the protections of the new law, employers must first obtain a written authorization from the employee to release the information, and that consent must be signed and dated, and in either a stand-alone document, or be a conspicuous part of the employment application (in bold and larger typeface) which states: “I, (applicant), hereby give consent to any and all prior employers of mine to provide information with regard to my employment with prior employers to… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
The style of the case is Assurity Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
(citing Jaimez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
Kaersvang: Marbury v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Let's look at Oracle's bold practices and inability to learn a lesson. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
Mayo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
On March 20, 2012, in an opinion written by Justice Breyer, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Mayo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:49 pm
They thus join Timberridge Presbytery of Atlanta in asking the high court to correct the wretched excesses wrought by ECUSA and PCUSA as a result of Justice Blackmun's fatuous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:29 am
Case Information Richard v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:56 am
After Sackett v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:22 am
(This post is part two of a two-part series on the European Court of Human Rights' decision in the Hirsi v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm
Cascades Computer Innovation v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
In W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 – read judgment The Supreme Court has made a difficult decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
And there were plenty of states where you couldn’t hold public office if you didn’t swear to believe in God (as opposed to Allah, Buddha or a flying plate of spaghetti) until the Torcaso v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:28 am
In the recent Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas case of Oesterling v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:37 pm
This is not as bold as my favored language from United States v. [read post]
