Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 1061 - 1080 of 8,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:59 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Brown that the state of California had no reason to strip from lesbians and gay men the right to wed. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
” A new world was dawning in the United States as well, King said, thanks to the Supreme Court’s 1954 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
No. 10–0010 MUELLER, BROWN, KRUSE, MILLER, and PHIPPS, v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:09 pm by JURIST Staff
Automatism as previously defined by the Court is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R v Stone, paragraph 156). [read post]