Search for: "State v. Burns"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
Remember that under Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
Suarez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 2:00 am
Suarez v. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 8:05 pm
The case is Berry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:25 pm
In Allison v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
The last RCI employee was Charles Burns. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 12:09 pm
Facts: This case (American Modern Home Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 12:15 am
United States Dep't of the Treasury, 2025 WL 41924, at *13 (E.D. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:41 am
Allen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:56 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
And when the court addressed the 1846 retrocession in Phillips v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:40 am
To the contrary, the more prudent conclusion is that Terveer, when contrasted against Burns v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:44 pm
" Here is the abstract:This paper 1) notices that Booker uprooted the statutory basis for the departure concept, suggesting that courts are at liberty to deviate from precedent rooted in the pre-Booker concept; 2) explains why Rule 32(i)(1)(C) as read by Burns v United States requires notice prior to sua sponte non-Guidelines sentences in those jurisdictions that require a distinct legal determination if a non-Guidelines sentence is warranted; and 3) discusses… [read post]