Search for: "State v. C. G. B." Results 1061 - 1080 of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2022, 1:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Schultz (1988), the Court upheld a ban (not just a time limitation but a total ban) that had no exemption, on the grounds that it was (a) content-neutral, (b) narrowly tailored to serving an important interest in protecting residential privacy, and (c) left people free to engage in "[g]eneral marching through residential neighborhoods, or even walking a route in front of an entire block of houses. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
They walk around confused about sponsorship b/c of their priors! [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Second, Justice Ramos concludes that, under LLC Law §§1002(c), (g) and 1005(b), the valid membership approval of the merger forecloses Stulman from pursuing any legal or equitable remedies other than his appraisal rights. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
Moreover, since the mere use of goods is not infringement, Article 3(5) should not apply to those imports and exports for personal use or consumption (this could be hard to reconcile with Case C-98/13 Blomquist v Rolex, on which see Jeremy's post here, if Regulation 608/2013 on customs enforcement is deemed applicable: should it be?) [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm by maureen
——=_NextPart_001_00CA_01CC05CC.B33453C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”koi8-r” Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable g =20 MAUREEN A. [read post]