Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC." Results 1061 - 1080 of 1,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2012, 7:14 am
The lawsuit brought under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims act is captioned Trinh v North East Medical Services, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15]  The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the employees.[16]  It is… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:29 am by Sean Wajert
Quest Diagnostics Inc., 256 F.R.D. 437, 478 (D.N.J. 2009); Solo v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Concerned about how the mandates and costs of  the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act will impact your corporate and family finances following the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:11 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Bancorp, Domino’s Pizza, Roth Staffing/Ultimate Staffing, Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC, Certified Tire & Service Centers, Inc., MetroPCS California, LLC., Jack In The Box and Skilled Healthcare, LLC. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 8:39 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Comcast’s cert petition in Behrend set the case up as a straightforward application of the Court’s landmark 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Taking time to make changes needed to find and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]