Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1061 - 1080 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SUNY/CSC [Respondents] appealed the Supreme Court's rulings.Addressing the standing of SED to initiate the action in Proceeding 1, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Graziano v County of Albany, 3 NY3d 475, observed that governmental entities have the capacity to sue only when it is based upon a "concrete statutory predicate ... expressly granted in enabling legislation or it may be inferred from review of the entity's statutory functions or… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Appellate Division Fourth Department held as such, and the New York Court of Appeals agrees. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), the case involved an appeal on jurisdictional grounds from the District Court’s order appointing a receiver in an action to dissolve a pair of realty holding LLCs. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Appellate courts defer to the jury's judgment, and unless there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support the jury's verdict, the Court of Appeals (or the Appellate Division in state court) will not disturb the verdict.The case is Bradshaw v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
I won’t be content to get a good job by getting a good education,” he wrote, “I want to get the best job by getting the best education. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:05 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The successor Brown Chiari firm operated continuously as a law practice from 2007 until 2016, when Capizzi sent Brown and Chiari a letter stating, “With this letter I hereby withdraw from Brown Chiari, LLP. . . [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:07 pm by Goldberg Jones
In 1969, the California Court of Appeals published an opinion on professional education as a divisible asset in divorce as it pertained to Todd v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
                Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] (9) (b) (2) (i) was amended to read as follows:                (i) The court may modify an order of child support, including an order   incorporating without merging an agreement or stipulation of the   parties, upon a showing of a substantial change in… [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:23 am by Irina Manta
Essentially questioning the existence of an actionable form of harm, the majority decision of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, stated: At the time plaintiff first became aware she was pregnant, she had the legal right to safely abort the fetus. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:03 pm by Howard Knopf
"Deliverance" by John Boorman 1972Here’s a summer’s end snapshot about the state of copyright in Canada in 2019 as we:Digest two contrasting and competing parliamentary committee reports;Await the ruling, which could come at any time now, of the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by William Ford
Cicilline continued, asking whether amici can appeal a FISC decision to the FISA Court of Review. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Robert Brammer
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:18 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  In order to make a finding of vindictiveness, Florida’s Supreme Court in Wilson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
On appeal the Appellate Division held that the validity of the mother's waiver of the right to counsel was the subject of contest before trial court, and thus the mother was permitted to raise on appeal her contention that trial court erred in failing to ensure that her waiver was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. [read post]