Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 1061 - 1080 of 23,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 2:31 pm by Jeff Klein
 As the district court stated, “Just because a company is in the same business as a tortfeasor, the company is not automatically liable for the harm caused by the tortfeasor’s product. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:17 am by VALL Blog Master
What about harm to the copyright owners? [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court of Appeal, however rejected his appeal on the basis that “the alleged future harm would emanate not from the intentional acts or omissions of public authorities or non-state bodies, but instead from a naturally occurring illness and the lack of sufficient resources to deal with it in the receiving country”. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
It is clear(er) that this is to be intended as actual, rather than potential harm [this conclusion also appears supported further by what is stated at paras 48 and 49, as well as 70]. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
But in some cases, such as this one, trivial and manufactured harms may be sufficient to state a claim. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Petitioners sued the IFC, claiming that pollution from the plant harmed the surrounding air, land, and water. [read post]