Search for: "State v. Irons"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 2,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2008, 12:54 am
State Farm case. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 2:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
***That is Shetty.For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use the following link: Shetty v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
It is ironic that someone so (properly) interested in the attack on democracy being leveled by contemporary Republican would-be hegemons in state governments (with regard to various legislation designed to reduced turnout by potential opposition voters) is so indifferent to the anti-democratic aspects of her own embrace of the wisdom of the framers. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:04 pm
But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who in 2000 joined the majority in Hill v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
Coal, Iron & R.R. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 am
Similarly, citing United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:34 pm
Ironically, NJ remains one of the few states grandfathered by federal legislation to take a reverse-offset allowing the employers and their insurance companies to take the offset. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:37 pm
Pahnke v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
Sweeney, et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 3:15 pm
See, of course, CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:26 am
In Lathus v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:41 am
Justice Kennedy’s current disapproval of the merits-first process is particularly ironic given that only ten years ago he authored Saucier v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Ogden v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Corizon, Inc., 949 F.3d 489, 506 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (same); United States v. [read post]
