Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 44,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 6:16 pm
On December 8, 2015, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Evenwel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
Most people, understandably, see the Supreme Court of the United States as the court of last resort. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
The Court of Appeals has addressed whether someone is registerable both via Article 78 and direct appeal (North v Board, 8 NY3d 735 [2007]; People v Kennedy, 7 NY3d 87 [2006]). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
Plus it's in state court, which means he likely gets out in two and a half. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
”Referring to Kennedy v. [read post]
