Search for: "State v. Risk" Results 1061 - 1080 of 28,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Because the law varies from state to state, specialty pharmacies should consult with an attorney licensed in each state in which they operate to ensure compliance with applicable federal and state laws. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:09 pm by lennyesq
Residents in this category who need an abortion will be faced with an impossible choice: giving birth and caring for a baby they do not want and likely cannot afford to raise, or traveling out of state for an abortion and risking a violation of their parole or probation conditions, which could land them back in prison. *** Around 666,400 women are on parole or probation at any given day in the U.S., according to a recent Prison Policy Initiative report. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm by David Klein
It has been about one year and eight months since the United States Supreme Court released its landmark decision in Facebook v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Exhibit A: The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Chevron v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[xi] In addition to intensifying scrutiny at the federal level, the private equity industry also faces the continued risk of private FCA litigation and enforcement actions by state attorney generals in pursuing actions under their respective state equivalents of the FCA. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Although we often are quick to forget the fact, “the real risks, the real threats, of terrorist attacks are constant and not likely soon to abate,” Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) & Collateral Enforcement Risks: A Review (October 12, 2022): The False Claims Act is the primary civil enforcement tool utilized by our government today. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]