Search for: "State v. Sellers"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 3,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2020, 4:11 am
I v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 4:33 pm
, 2015 WL 1959935- evidence sufficient to hold shareholder personally liable for a $6 million dollar penalty; State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm
"Recreational dancing is not a form of expression protected by the federal or state constitutions," the court wrote.But, according to the plurality of the SCOTUS in Barnes v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 9:29 am
Services of Florida Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
As has been stated, the rewards shall also stand transferred along with the risk in a sale transaction. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
This principle was also adopted in Canada, with the Supreme Court of Canada stating in 1978 in Elsley v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:10 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am
North Dakota. (4) States that voluntarily and adequately simplify their tax systems should be authorized to correct the present inequities in taxation through requiring sellers to collect taxes on sales of goods or services delivered in-state, without regard to the location of the seller. (5) The States have experience, expertise, and a vital interest in the collection of sales and use taxes, and thus should take the lead in developing and implementing… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:55 am
In McKinnis v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 9:08 am
Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:55 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Northern Bottling Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 2:26 am
Because the test is objective, the seller’s subjective intent or state of mind is irrelevant. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:02 am
See Happel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 12:02 pm
Perhaps the INS v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
Cole v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:30 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
The dismissal predated the Third Circuit’s decision in Fellner v. [read post]
