Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Who do you think is right in this one; the trial court or the Court of Appeal? [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:08 am
Finally, the court followed the California Third District Court of Appeal’s holding in California Forestry Association v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
Superior Court (1987). [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
While the trial court judge had ruled that the Defendant had to be served at her place of business for venue to be proper in Philadelphia, the Superior Court instead found that Rule 402(a) "clearly states that service may be effected by 'handing a copy to the defendant.'" According to an article on the case by Amaris Elliott-Engel in the June 9, 2011 Legal Intelligencer, the case of Silver v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
The Court held in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:08 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:55 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:08 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:09 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 2:50 am
Heiman, Superior Court of the State of Delaware. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 8:29 am
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division in Jennifer Woo-Padva v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:50 am
Ct., June 13, 2007), a Maricopa County, Arizona Superior Court judge held that the state's school voucher program does not violate the Arizona constitution's ban on appropriating public funds for religious instruction or for private or sectarian schools. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:37 am
Early this year, we wrote about Dawe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:12 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 6:10 am
Jackson, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge denied relief requested in a petition filed by the chair of the Arizona Republican Party. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
The Superior Court reversed the trial court’s order and remanded the case, citing procedural reasons and identifying the decision as non-precedential. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
See Varboncoeur v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
It justified the ruling on the ground that the Pennsylvania Superior Court panels failed to enforce the federal policy favoring enforcement of arbitration agreements. [read post]
