Search for: "State v. Tims"
Results 1061 - 1080
of 1,379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Concepcion on the validity of class action waivers Other speakers include my co-blogger Professor Jeff Sovern; Peggy Twohig and Leonard Chanin, two key officials responsible for standing up the CFPB; Tim Fernholz of the New America Foundation, who has written extensively on the CFPB; Dennis Cuevas of the National Association of Attorneys General; and representatives of state AG offices. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
The district court, relying on this Court’s decision in Streets v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:46 am
~Tim [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Lemley, Stanford Law School; Carl Malamud, Public.Resource.Org; John Mayer, Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction; Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly Media; Stuart Sierra, Columbia Law School; Erika V. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Lemley, Stanford Law School; Carl Malamud, Public.Resource.Org; John Mayer, Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction; Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly Media; Stuart Sierra, Columbia Law School; Erika V. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm
Vinson’s opinion hasn’t provoked Common Cause to demonstrate/riot in front of a hotel, much less a war.So Vinson’s opinion is almost exactly like Scott v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm
As Tim Jost explained in Health Affairs: Medical loss ratios have long been of interest primarily to investors. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:08 pm
That amount can include the amount of a car payment.In the recent Supreme Court case Ransom v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
[EPIC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:26 pm
~Tim [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
” United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:07 am
"Second Life Ordered to Stop Honoring a Copyright Owner's Takedown Notices--Amaretto Ranch Breedables v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court has held (in Lamont v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Supreme Court decision in Berghuis v Smith. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:01 am
The state will fall once again into drought, and unemployment will remain at functionally its current level most of the year, measured in jobs created versus jobs lost. [read post]
